1. Product Identification & Target Market Definition
Steps:
- Identify target regions (US, EU, UK, Australia, MENA, ROW) and corresponding regulatory pathways (ANDA, MAA)
- Evaluate patent landscape, RLD/RS availability, bioequivalence feasibility, and market attractiveness.
- Conduct cost–market–API (CMA) assessments for prioritization.
Common Mistakes:
- Selecting products without confirming RLD source or BE feasibility.
- Ignoring pharmacopoeial differences (BP vs. USP).
- Over-estimating market exclusivity or neglecting patent challenges.
2. API and Excipient Selection
Steps:
- Choose DMF-listed API suppliers with reliable QMS.
- Match physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties (solubility, PSD, polymorphism) to formulation needs.
- Qualify global excipient sources for regional filings.
Common Mistakes:
- Ignoring BCS classification implications.
- Using different excipient grades for early vs. exhibit batches.
- Lack of cross-regional alignment on API–excipient compatibility data.
3. Formulation Development
Steps:
- Apply QbD principles (ICH Q8–Q10) to define CMAs, CPPs, and CQAs.
- Use DOE to establish design space and control strategy.
- Benchmark formulation attributes with RLD.
Common Mistakes:
- Trial-and-error rather than structured DOE.
- Improper dissolution media selection for BE prediction.
- Unoptimized process parameters leading to poor scale-up.
4. Analytical Development
Steps:
- Develop and validate stability-indicating methods.
- Align specifications with ICH Q6A and regional pharmacopeias.
- Ensure comparative profiling with RLD for assay, content uniformity, dissolution, and impurities.
Common Mistakes:
- Incomplete method transfer packages.
- Variations in analytical conditions between R&D and plant.
- Lack of equivalency justification during transfer.
5. Stability and Compatibility Studies
Steps:
- Conduct ICH Q1A(R2)-compliant studies across climatic zones.
- Perform API–excipient compatibility under stress.
- Apply risk-based bracketing/matrixing where applicable.
Common Mistakes:
- Relying on short-term stability data for submissions.
- Ignoring Zone IVb studies (MENA/ROW).
- Inconsistent correlation between pilot and exhibit batch data.
6. Process Optimization and Scale-Up
Steps:
- Validate mixing, granulation, coating, and homogenization parameters.
- Execute validation batches under commercial-like conditions.
Common Mistakes:
- Equipment mismatch between R&D and manufacturing.
- No CPP–CQA linkage verification after scale-up.
- Missing feedback loop for process improvement.
7. Bioequivalence and Clinical Studies
Steps:
- Choose BE sites approved by the target authority (MHRA, USFDA, etc.).
- Use biowaivers for BCS I/III where justified.
- Design IVIVC for SR/MR formulations.
Common Mistakes:
- BE failure due to unmatched release profiles or food-effect issues.
- Composition mismatch between BE and exhibit batches.
- Poor documentation for sample accountability.
Read also:
- Generic Drug Development Process
- BCS-Based Biowaiver vs. In Vivo Bioequivalence Study
- Justification for Control of Elemental Impurities in Formulation
Resource Person: Moinuddin Syed. Ph.D, PMP®
The article is easy to understand because there is only main points required to learn